Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 4143 Location: Shirley, NY
Welcome to the new forum area just for the upstate NY region
For all our members in the upstate NY area, this section is for you. Use it to meet, plan events and local meets.
Enjoy!!!
_________________ Black 1985 SS & Black 2001 SS - Recent addition - White 1986 SS for the wife!
Thu Oct 21, 2004 5:56 am
Route9terror NYMCC - Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 10 Location: Upstate NY
Hi
Anyone in the middle Hudson Valley looking to Cruise??? My buddy and I cruise route 9 near Poughkeepsie on weekends and we are always looking for new Metal!!!
_________________ Go have daddy buy you a new car from the junkyard son....and try to keep up with the Montes
Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:40 am
Don05856 NYMCC - New Member
Joined: 05 Feb 2004 Posts: 9 Location: New York
hawk2003 wrote:
Thats a ride.Im about 15 to 20 miles east of Rochester.lol.
Joined: 12 Jun 2004 Posts: 56 Location: neversink ny
back yard
my back yard is in sull co not verymany montes here when i go to the cruses i have the only one , and i cant stand the fartpipe hondas , real cars make noise not farts, and i havesome doors frome an 87 ss t top, any one crusing loacaly on the west side ove the river let me know
_________________ 87 LSS , there is a fine line between crazy and stupid ! what side of the line are you on?
Sat Jun 23, 2007 7:35 pm
CMone NYMCC - Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Posts: 112 Location: Mechanicville, NY
I'm 18 miles North of Albany
Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:59 pm
dduffy24 NYMCC - Bronze Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 667 Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Don't look like anyone has been around in here for a while. LOL
Joined: 11 Mar 2003 Posts: 3262 Location: Farmingville,NY
Quote:
and its going up by the day.
On estaion locally went from $3.87 to $3.94 overnight!!!! How come it never falls 7 cents in one day
_________________ Jay - 86 Monte LS
We'll be Friends till we're old and senile.... then we'll be New Friends.
Sun May 11, 2008 9:30 am
87 Monte LS NYMCC - Silver Member
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1145 Location: Tonawanda, NY
it goes up at leaast .02 cents a day here.i was cleaning out the 96 the other day and found a gas receipt from may of 2005 89 oct was $ 2.31 a gallon, ah the good old days
Sun May 11, 2008 9:30 am
murd450 NYMCC - Member
Joined: 12 Jun 2004 Posts: 56 Location: neversink ny
i havent realy been watching gass prices last time i bout super it was $3.99.9 , i drive a diesel pickup truck and man i bout diesel saterday and it was $4.79.9 what a kick in the @$$
_________________ 87 LSS , there is a fine line between crazy and stupid ! what side of the line are you on?
Tue May 13, 2008 5:57 am
twomanymontes NYMCC - Platinum Member
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 3728 Location: Amherst, NY
I'm glad the 01 runs the cheap stuff! 3.87 is getting out of control! My truck at 7 MPG sucks!
_________________ There is no such thing as Too Many Montes
NYMCC Upstate NY Chapter Rep. Member of the Motley Cruisers Car Club
Wed May 14, 2008 9:56 pm
87 Monte LS NYMCC - Silver Member
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1145 Location: Tonawanda, NY
LOL gas was $4.07 at 9:45am this morning, 10 minutes later guy out there changing the sign to $4,13 no end in sight
Thu May 29, 2008 9:40 pm
twomanymontes NYMCC - Platinum Member
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 3728 Location: Amherst, NY
$4.17! This is getting out of control now! If Exxon/Mobil list another $400 Billion in profits this year, I think the goverment needs to really start checking for price gouging! Oh Wait, the goverment has their hands in big oil companies! So I guess that will never happen!
_________________ There is no such thing as Too Many Montes
NYMCC Upstate NY Chapter Rep. Member of the Motley Cruisers Car Club
Sat May 31, 2008 3:07 pm
87 Monte LS NYMCC - Silver Member
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1145 Location: Tonawanda, NY
twomanymontes wrote:
$4.17! This is getting out of control now! If Exxon/Mobil list another $400 Billion in profits this year, I think the goverment needs to really start checking for price gouging! Oh Wait, the goverment has their hands in big oil companies! So I guess that will never happen!
Boy Idont get it either, time for another boston tea party !!!!!!
Sat May 31, 2008 9:02 pm
dduffy24 NYMCC - Bronze Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 667 Location: Ballston Spa, NY
87 Monte LS wrote:
twomanymontes wrote:
$4.17! This is getting out of control now! If Exxon/Mobil list another $400 Billion in profits this year, I think the goverment needs to really start checking for price gouging! Oh Wait, the goverment has their hands in big oil companies! So I guess that will never happen!
Boy Idont get it either, time for another boston tea party !!!!!!
Joined: 02 Nov 2007 Posts: 282 Location: Pburgh NY
Me too...
It was 4.23 last night when I bought gas. Luckily with not having a job I haven't really been "going" anywhere. $30 lasts me all week and then some. I've driven the monte a couple times here and there but its out of commission anyway so it doesn't really matter. Hopefully fuel injection will be an improvement to mileage.
And...I can't imagine trying to live on minimum wage and paying for fuel oil to heat their homes. I sort of wish I still had a woodstove. Heck, I'll bet even baseboard heat will be cheaper than oil by the time winter comes around again. I think we should really stick it to the oil companies and use whatever available alternative fuels possible.
__________________
There is no such thing as Too Many Montes Member of the Motley Cruisers Car Club
The '71 year saw only modest styling changes. Inside, the SS model got new "European symbol knobs", and a four-spoke steering wheel became optional. 1971 Monte Carlo also saw the addition of a stand-up hood ornament. Mechanically, it was largely unchanged, although the small-block Turbo-Fire 400 two-barrel engine was dropped. Other engines had compression ratios lowered to allow the use of regular leaded, low-lead, or unleaded gasoline, per a GM corporate edict. Engine ratings fell to 245 hp (183 kW) for the base Turbo-Fire 350 CID (5.7 L) two-barrel, 270 hp (201 kW) for the Turbo-Fire 350-4V, and 300 hp (224 kW) for the Turbo-Jet 400. The SS 454 engine was actually raised to a nominal 365 gross hp (272 kW) despite the reduction in compression ratio. This increase in horsepower was a result of the 454 engine using the more aggressive camshaft from the 390 hp 454 used in the 1970 Chevrolet Corvette and full-sized sedans.
Chevrolet listed both gross and SAE net horsepower figures in 1971 with the impending change to SAE net ratings in 1972. The ratings compared as follows:
Engine
Carburetor
Gross hp
Net hp
Turbo-Fire 350 CID V8
2-bbl
245 hp
165 hp
Turbo-Fire 350 CID V8
4-bbl
270 hp
175 hp
Turbo-Jet 400 CID V8
4-bbl
300 hp
260 hp
Turbo-Jet 454 CID V8
4-bbl
365 hp
285 hp
There has been no documented case of a 1971 Monte Carlo SS car with the 425 hp (317 kW) LS-6 version of the 454, with solid valve lifters and a longer-duration camshaft, previously found in the 1970 Chevelle SS 454 (where it was rated at 450 hp (336 kW)); however, they did come with an LS5 454. The Turbo Hydramatic officially remained the only transmission for the SS, but a heavy-duty clutch option on the order form suggests that it may have been possible to special-order a 454 LS-6 with a four-speed manual transmission (the four-speed wasn't listed officially as an "SS" option but was available as an RPO in regular Monte Carlos with the 350 and 400 engines). The exact number of such combinations, if any, is unknown since they were not officially listed as factory options but possibly assembled through Chevrolet's "Central Office Production Order" (COPO) process that had previously made possible model/engine combinations not officially available. However, there has never been a documented case of such a combination. Chevrolet records indicate that the factory only installed the LS-6 installations in Corvettes that year.
The SS 454 package would be discontinued after this year following production of only 1,919 units, but the 454 CID V8 engine would remain optional in Monte Carlos through 1975. The reason given for discontinuing the SS was that the Monte Carlo was marketed as a luxury vehicle instead of a muscle car. The SS nameplate would be resurrected 12 years later. Yet, at the same time that the Monte Carlo SS was judged a failure in the marketplace and discontinued, the Monte's reputation as a performance car on the race track was gaining strength because Ford and Chrysler were ending their factory-backed racing support due to declining muscle car sales and the need to divert dollars to meet costly Federal safety and emission regulations (General Motors' official policy had prohibited factory racing efforts since 1963). As factory support ended at Ford and Chrysler, the stock-car racing mantle switched to independent teams and sponsors, who overwhelmingly chose Chevrolets over Ford and Chrysler products due to Chevy's much greater availability and affordability of over-the-counter racing parts through the Chevy dealer network. And the Monte Carlo was considered the best suited Chevrolet model for stock car racing by most NASCAR teams due to its 116 in (2,900 mm) wheelbase (only one inch above NASCAR's minimum requirements at that time, the Chevelle 2-doors had a shorter 112-inch wheelbase) and long-hood design which placed the engine further back in the chassis than most other vehicles for better weight traction. Thus the Monte Carlo became Chevy's standard-bearer for NASCAR from 1971 to 1989.
Like its 1970 predecessor, production of the 1971 Monte Carlo also got off to a slow start due to a labor strike, this time a 67-day corporate-wide walkout that coincided with the introduction of the 1971 models in September, 1970, leaving dealerships with only a small shipment of 1971 models (built before the strike) in stock until the strike was settled in mid-November, 1970 and then slow-going in reaching normal production levels until around January 1, 1971. Model-year production ended at 128,600 including the 1,919 SS models. AM/FM stereo radios with 8-track tape players were optional.[5]
ur's 20 inches longer thats alot of a car lol and shorter thou odd.. so ur 71 is a short fat guy with long legs.. odd 06/07 would be taller .. maybe due to tire size on the 06/07 being 18"s? dont know what size stock 71 came in..
-- Edited by hope4anarchy99 on Wednesday 15th of August 2012 09:45:43 PM
well then we found the answer those 3 inches indeed equal the height difference between the 71 and 06/07.... those engine compartments in ur 71 goota be big enough for 2 "5.3"'s lol what u think